Discussion Forums

Re: Yes
William Hooper / NA
24 Dec 2008 10:30AM ET

20%... I am saying by not using bit 8 in the stream you have lost 1/8 of the data possibly.. Sorry that is 12.5%

The Fast Fix documentation and sample code. For eample just to understand what the message structure is I have on page 44 a few words about "Transfer Encoding" with no diagrams etc.

The translation of FIX into Fast is something else again.

The documents are really really hard to get to grips with. Also the sample code is very limited. String Delta operation for example. Unless I am missing something you have not bothered with that in the c# sample code but it used all the time.

I used to get EBS LIVE via XML and the code was trivial - literally a few days work. I am trying to use their new Fast Fix feed but it's really a nighmare. So far it has taken me about a week and I have still not logged on properly.

Even when i have done all this I see EBS LIVE sends strings like "SPOT.EUR/USD" down the line. It is all a mess.

What would I do instead? I don;t pretend to have an answer to that but for EBS LIVE they could have written a much easier format which saved a lot of space and was super easy to pass. Using Fast Fix was a nighmare and a waste of time unless you own a fast fix engine already. Why bother with mantissa and exponent when all their prices could be sent as integer? they have no text data to send just prices so I would have had no strings in the messages at all. Why send body length and checksums in the fix over fast stuff. Just more work. Why send string timestamps when it takes 40us to turn a time to a string when you could send an int64 tick time. By trying to do everything it just turn into a nightmare and is slow to boot.


FAST too complex?
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   3 Dec 2008 2:42PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Majkara Majka / me   3 Dec 2008 5:44PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   4 Dec 2008 3:58AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Majkara Majka / me   5 Dec 2008 6:42PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Anders Furuhed / Pantor Engineering   6 Dec 2008 2:57AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   4 Dec 2008 4:23AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Jim Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   4 Dec 2008 4:46AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rich Shriver / Jordan & Jordan   4 Dec 2008 10:16AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Glenn McClements   4 Dec 2008 12:06PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   4 Dec 2008 5:44PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   7 Dec 2008 3:12AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Kevin Houstoun   4 Dec 2008 9:08AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rufus Me / Self   5 Dec 2008 2:58AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   5 Dec 2008 3:26AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Daniel May / SpryWare, LLC   9 Dec 2008 3:02PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rufus Me / Self   6 Dec 2008 4:48AM ET
Yes
William Hooper / NA   23 Dec 2008 8:30AM ET
Re: Yes
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   23 Dec 2008 9:49AM ET
Re: Yes
William Hooper / NA   24 Dec 2008 10:30AM ET
Re: Yes
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   24 Dec 2008 2:14PM ET
Re: Yes
Clive Browning / Rapid Addition Ltd   24 Dec 2008 4:52PM ET
Re: Yes
Ravi Ravisankar / IBM   23 Dec 2008 8:55PM ET
Re: Yes
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   24 Dec 2008 12:59AM ET
Re: Yes
Ravi Ravisankar / IBM   25 Dec 2008 9:39PM ET
Supporting OPRA
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   26 Dec 2008 2:02AM ET
Re: Supporting OPRA
Ravi Ravisankar / IBM   29 Dec 2008 10:39AM ET
Re: Yes
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   28 Jan 2009 5:37AM ET
Re: Yes
William Hooper / NA   24 Dec 2008 10:46AM ET
Re: Yes
Rufus Me / Self   28 Dec 2008 8:43PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Sebastien Fortas / Societe Generale   24 Dec 2008 1:30PM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   25 Dec 2008 2:35AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Michael Wynne / Michael Wynne & Co   9 Jan 2009 6:39AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   9 Jan 2009 7:23AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Anders Furuhed / Pantor Engineering   9 Jan 2009 7:28AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   9 Jan 2009 9:50AM ET
Re: FAST too complex?
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   17 Jan 2009 12:48PM ET