|
High Performance Interface WG
< Previous Next >
Re: Organizing the Work of Writing Requirements
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering
5 Mar 2011 4:49AM ET John, having spent some time reviewing the dot-p2p.org wiki I remain unconvinced. There is little focus, a fair amount of random comments and some outright spam.
You are obviously free to try it outside of the FPL.
I'm voting against this arrangement for the HPIwg.
/Rolf
> Further to this post, I promised to post an example of a protocol that is being organized through a wiki. The one I had in mind is dot-p2p, which is a new, peer-to-peer DNS:
> http://dot-p2p.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
>
> It does get spammed. Here is its pages list:
> http://dot-p2p.org/index.php?title=Special:PrefixIndex
>
> But it also is used. Some stats:
> http://dot-p2p.org/index.php?title=Special:Statistics
>
> > As discussed on our call this morning, I would like to see this group try an open wiki to help with the process of documenting requirements, which is the next task at hand.
> >
> > My proposal is as follows:
> >
> > 1) Allow and encourage anyone to edit.
> >
> > 2) Give administrative control to multiple, trusted people, so that profanity, spam, vandalism, etc. can be quickly caught and remedied.
> >
> > 3) Implement moderated edit rights if dealing with miscreants becomes too time-consuming.
> >
> > 4) Locate the wiki within the fixprotocol.org domain.
> >
> > If that isn't agreeable, then I would propose to set one up myself and request permission to post the URL within the discussion forum (without accusations of spamming). I would do so under Creative Commons license and pledge the content in advance to FPL.
Re: Organizing the Work of Writing Requirements
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering 5 Mar 2011 4:49AM ET
|
@FIXProtocol
