|
5.0 SP1 Feedback
< Previous Next >
re: EP60 - Contingent Orders
Rikard Hedberg / OMX
18 Jan 2008 9:34AM ETAndre,
the main consideration to not including the receiver assigned identifier was that we did not want to introduce new identifier fields in primarily a message as the Execution Report as that could lead to unnecessary breakage. The ambition of the group was to introduce as few changes as possible but define a standard approach to contingency order processing and field usage. We were also aware that some implementations already used List Orders for this purpose.
I agree with you that the identifier is relevant and would also support adding it in a future version. At the moment, however, there is no scheduled activity in enhancing the support for contingency orders.
Regards
Rikard
> Hi,
>
> I saw question of a sell-side assigned "OrderID" like ID to the
> ListOrder in the draft specification (p14) but I guess it was not put
> into SP1//www.fixprotocol.org/documents/3672/FIX%20Protocol%20Gap%20Analysis%20-
> %20Contingent%20Order%20Req%26%2339%3Bs%200.16.doc
>
> I would like to support this addition of sell-side assigned grouping id
> (ContingencyID?) similar to ListID from the buy-side. It would be added
> to ExecutionReport, ListStatus, ListCancelRequest.
re: EP60 - Contingent Orders
Rikard Hedberg / OMX 18 Jan 2008 9:34AM ET
|
