Discussion Forums

Re: Population of tag 39 and 150 in ExecReport (after a Reject)
John Prewett / Lava Trading
24 Feb 2010 12:17PM ET

> Behaviors such as this are subject to the rules of engagement. In the
> case of reduction in quantity - there are behaviors supported by some
> exchanges that allow the indicated quantity to be interpreted as the
> quantity remaining open to be filled. Again, this behavior and the
> corresponding messaging values are described in the rules of engagement
> for the exchange.

All behavior is subject to documented rules of engagement.
I was indicating what the behavior should be if the execution venue followed the specification.

We have this standard to reduce the effort taken to establish communications with a new entity and also to reduce the number of trading discrepancies.

When protocol deviations are introduced, the effort taken to establish communications with a new entity increases and misunderstandings are more likely to occur. So using non-standard rules of engagement reduces the efficiency of everyone's organizations and can cause trading discrepancies, particularly in edge cases (such as quantity reduction).

Execution venues have a special role in standards adherence. They set the tone for the rest of the industry.

Sorry to I've start preaching here, but I believe that following the standard is very important.

Thanks

JohnP


Population of tag 39 and 150 in ExecReport (after a Reject)
Christiaan de Vries / Baxter-FX   24 Feb 2010 11:07AM ET
Re: Population of tag 39 and 150 in ExecReport (after a Reject)
John Prewett / Lava Trading   24 Feb 2010 11:27AM ET
Re: Population of tag 39 and 150 in ExecReport (after a Reject)
Jay De Young / Chicago Mercantile Exchange   24 Feb 2010 11:49AM ET
Re: Population of tag 39 and 150 in ExecReport (after a Reject)
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   24 Feb 2010 12:11PM ET
Re: Population of tag 39 and 150 in ExecReport (after a Reject)
John Prewett / Lava Trading   24 Feb 2010 12:17PM ET