|
FAST Protocol
< Previous Next >
Re: FAST 1.2 clarification
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB
21 May 2009 5:13PM ET SHOULD as in the 1.2 specification is not written yet and this particular tidbit is not covered by the 1.2 extension proposal. But your case 1 is what the proposal should have said, had it been more specific on this matter.
/David
> If you're using SHOULD (as opposed to saying MUST), then the answer
> is 3, right?
>
> - Craig
>
> > It should be case 1. The auxiliary identifier is a property of the
> > field rather than a property of the type of the field.
> >
> > /David
> >
> >
> > > In the FAST 1.2 spec, it states: So: <string name=”Foo”> <copy/>
> > > </string> translates to: <field name=”Foo”> <string> <copy/>
> > > </string> </field>
> > >
> > > I'd like to know what <string name="Foo" id="12"> <copy/> </string>
> > > translates to. Is it
> > > 1. <field name=”Foo” id="12"> <string> <copy/> </string>
> > > </field> or
> > > 2. <field name=”Foo”> <string id="12"> <copy/> </string>
> > > </field> or
> > > 3. either one is acceptable.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Craig
Re: FAST 1.2 clarification
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB 21 May 2009 5:13PM ET
|
