Discussion Forums

re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Ryan Pierce / Townsend Analytics Ltd. / Archipelago LLC
25 Feb 1999 8:52PM ET

> Is this correct? Should PartyA send 8 as the NewSeqNum and duplicate the sequence number used for the logon message with the next message? Or should PartyA send NewSeqNum = 9?

This question may be simpler than I made it out to be.

Yes, I believe A should send 8 as the NewSeqNum because B asked for 1-7. But the next message A should normally be sending is 9. The only exception is if B asks for a ResendRequest of 8, and then 8 becomes a SeqReset-Gap Fill because Logons are never resent.

If A were to send, say, a Heartbeat or an application message with sequence number 8 after already using it for a Logon, then I think A is doing something wrong.


Sequence Number reset after logon
Scott Zionic / Peters Securities   25 Feb 1999 7:54PM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Ryan Pierce / Townsend Analytics Ltd. / Archipelago LLC   25 Feb 1999 8:40PM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Ryan Pierce / Townsend Analytics Ltd. / Archipelago LLC   25 Feb 1999 8:52PM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Bob Lamoureux / Bridge Information Systems   26 Feb 1999 7:38AM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Keith Shangraw / Thomson Financial   2 Jul 1999 9:39AM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Scott Atwell / American Century   6 Jul 1999 8:26AM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Keith Shangraw / Thomson Financial   6 Jul 1999 9:00AM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Keith Shangraw / Thomson Financial   6 Jul 1999 10:49AM ET
re: Sequence Number reset after logon
Ryan Pierce / Townsend Analytics Ltd. / Archipelago LLC   6 Jul 1999 11:26AM ET