Discussion Forums

Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering
31 Jul 2008 10:15AM ET

Hanno, this is an interesting problem.

The short answer is no. There is no way for the receiver to detect that there is another field in the message. As you mention, you could put a placeholder into the template, maybe an optional field at the end of the template. This would maybe work in some instances, but you would be restricted in choice of operator etc.

We did discuss this some when we were updating the spec from 1.0 to 1.1, but nothing came out of that discussion if I recall correctly.

It's worth discussing again, though. Anyone has ideas on this?

/Rolf

> Rolf,
>
> I have a related question. Is there a way to send a new message
> without having sent a new template definition, i.e. if I add a
> field to my message, is there a way for the receiver to ignore
> that new field until he receives a new template definition from
> me, perhaps by appending it to the end of my message and having
> a placeholder in my initial template definition? Or is it a
> strict requirement to always send a new template definition
> prior to sending a message for it.
>
> Thanks, Hanno.


Fast SCP
Dimitry London / Morgan Stanley   30 Jul 2008 10:16PM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 1:14AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   31 Jul 2008 3:28AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 5:34AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   31 Jul 2008 6:17AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 7:39AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   31 Jul 2008 9:05AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   31 Jul 2008 10:06AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   31 Jul 2008 10:15AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Darshan Khedekar   31 Jul 2008 10:38AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Greg Orsini / Cameron Systems   31 Jul 2008 11:44AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 1:40AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 2:06AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 2:15AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 2:39AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 2:52AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 3:03AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 3:13AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 3:24AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   1 Aug 2008 3:33AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 3:39AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 3:57AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 4:10AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 3:06AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 6:28AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   1 Aug 2008 8:21AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 9:33AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Greg Orsini / Cameron Systems   1 Aug 2008 10:01AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 10:16AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Greg Orsini / Orc Software w/CameronFIX   1 Aug 2008 10:32AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 10:58AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 10:19AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 10:41AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   31 Jul 2008 11:10AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 1:34AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Dimitry London / Morgan Stanley   7 Aug 2008 10:53PM ET