|
FAST Protocol
< Previous Next >
Re: FAST Complaints
Brandon Yuille / BWY Systems
27 Jan 2010 3:23AM ET I'm resigning trying to explain my point. It doesn't seem like anyone wants to actually read what I'm saying. I was honestly trying to help the protocol be more efficient so for anyone taking offense to my comments please don't.
Oh and for the record I have not a clue what Majkara is talking about.
Brandon
> > That's why I was suggesting that if there is to be another FAST
> > version, it might be a good update to move the template id to the
> > beginning of the message and you can even set it to NULL if it is to
> > be copied from a previous message.
>
> That doesn't make sense. A NULL value means the field is not present in
> this record. The TID must be present.
>
> A zero PMAP bit for a field means the field is not present _on the
> wire_. To answer your earlier question, "Yes there are FAST data sources
> that omit the TID on the wire, relying on the implicit copy operator for
> the template ID. For this to work, the PMAP must come first.
>
> If this is a problem for your implementation, I might respectfully
> suggest you change your implementation rather than trying to change
> the protocol.
>
> Dale
Re: FAST Complaints
Brandon Yuille / BWY Systems 27 Jan 2010 3:23AM ET
|
