Discussion Forums

Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS <>
1 Aug 2008 3:24AM ET

Field operator changes: not possible, for that wouldn't be a IS_A relation.

Added fields to repeating groups: same as above.

T2 would be T1 + something so T2 is a T1.

Although
> our posts crossed. So you're suggesting a message length to handle
> *added* fields. So what about field operator changes, added fields to
> repeating groups, etc?
>
> > <-- would be a is_a relationship.
> > i/o implement this one would need , as suggested by Hanno, to carry
> > the length so that slicing can be operated properly
> >
> >> No.
> >>
> >> Given T1 <-- T2 and M encoded with T2
> >>
> >> If I have both T1 & T2, I can chose either.
> >>
> >> If I don't need the extra data added per T2, I can chose to use T1.
> >>
> >> By definition of T1 <-- T2 then a message encoded with T2 *must* be
> >> decodable by T1.
> >>
> >> If you decode M with T1, then you will "slice" your message somewhat,
> >> but that might be something you want, or still better that nothing
> >> when you don't have T2.
> >>
> >> This would allow senders to "evolve" their templates, giving the
> >> choice to receiver to use or not this "evolution"
> >>
> >>> Hm, I'm still not sure how this should be used. If you have both T1
> >>> and T2 then you can use the right template to decode. If you don't
> >>> have T2 then you're in trouble as T1 doesn't contain the info need?
> >>> Am I missing something?
> >>>
> >>> /Rolf


Fast SCP
Dimitry London / Morgan Stanley   30 Jul 2008 10:16PM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 1:14AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   31 Jul 2008 3:28AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 5:34AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   31 Jul 2008 6:17AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 7:39AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   31 Jul 2008 9:05AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   31 Jul 2008 10:06AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   31 Jul 2008 10:15AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Darshan Khedekar   31 Jul 2008 10:38AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Greg Orsini / Cameron Systems   31 Jul 2008 11:44AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 1:40AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 2:06AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 2:15AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 2:39AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 2:52AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 3:03AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 3:13AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 3:24AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   1 Aug 2008 3:33AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 3:39AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 3:57AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 4:10AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   1 Aug 2008 3:06AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 6:28AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   1 Aug 2008 8:21AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 9:33AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Greg Orsini / Cameron Systems   1 Aug 2008 10:01AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 10:16AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Greg Orsini / Orc Software w/CameronFIX   1 Aug 2008 10:32AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Aug 2008 10:58AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 10:19AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   31 Jul 2008 10:41AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   31 Jul 2008 11:10AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Jean-Marie Sulmont / RTS   1 Aug 2008 1:34AM ET
Re: Fast SCP
Dimitry London / Morgan Stanley   7 Aug 2008 10:53PM ET