Discussion Forums

Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Natan Kugel / BGC Partners <>
22 Jul 2010 4:38PM ET

The incentive is to come up with the best practice in regards to usage of ClOrdID [11] in trade Capture Reports.

The issue is described above, where there are at leat two approaches for populating ClOrdID in Trade Capture Reports.
1) Refer to ClOrdID [11] value in the matching Execution Reports
2) Refer to the current ClOrdID [11]

Each have pros and cons, as already outlined.

Note. The issue is unrelated to usage of OrdId [37], which is a valid reference. However, for all transactions related orders submitted electronically ClOrdId [11] must be provided - this is a principle that is used in trading. I will argue that this is a valid requirement in post trading.


ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Natan Kugel / BGC Partners   21 Jul 2010 5:06PM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Natan Kugel / BGC Partners   21 Jul 2010 5:09PM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Aaron Pryce / Consultancy   21 Jul 2010 8:20PM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Natan Kugel / BGC Partners   22 Jul 2010 8:39AM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Aaron Pryce / Consultancy   22 Jul 2010 4:19PM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Natan Kugel / BGC Partners   22 Jul 2010 4:38PM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Aaron Pryce / Consultancy   22 Jul 2010 5:57PM ET
Re: ClOrdID [11] value in trade capture reports
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   23 Jul 2010 9:56AM ET