Discussion Forums

4.0 Session   < Previous   Next >

Re: Can this be a partial fill?
Raheel Rao <>
14 Mar 2008 11:20AM ET

Thank you guys for your response.

regards,
Rao Raheel

> Since there is no order status precedence matrix for Fix 4.0, the
> example message quoted by Raheel can be considered as an invalid partial
> fill. However a lot of fix engines support the acceptance of this
> message and in practice there is no harm in doing so. To remove this
> drawback, It was in fix version 4.1, that tag 150 was used.
>
> Regards, Sunil Singh

Can this be a partial fill?
Raheel Rao   13 Mar 2008 1:01PM ET

Re: Can this be a partial fill?
Sunil Bopche / MErrill Lynch   13 Mar 2008 9:02PM ET

Re: Can this be a partial fill?
Tushar Deshpande / Citigroup   13 Mar 2008 9:38PM ET

Re: Can this be a partial fill?
Tushar Deshpande / Citigroup   13 Mar 2008 9:43PM ET

Re: Can this be a partial fill?
Sunil Singh / Tata Consultancy Services   13 Mar 2008 11:20PM ET

Re: Can this be a partial fill?
Raheel Rao   14 Mar 2008 11:20AM ET