Discussion Forums

FAST Protocol   < Previous   Next >

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Martin Gag / nobody
26 Aug 2008 11:45AM ET

I am interpreting that part of the spec a little bit different. I thought that the exponent is considered present if the presence bit is 0. Because the Value is taken from the dictionary then. And then the whole thing makes sense to me.

can anybody confirm?

Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   22 Aug 2008 4:06AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Martin Gag / nobody   26 Aug 2008 11:45AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   1 Sep 2008 7:14AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   27 Aug 2008 10:38AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   1 Sep 2008 6:56AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Sep 2008 7:27AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   1 Sep 2008 8:52AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Sep 2008 8:55AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   1 Sep 2008 9:08AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Sep 2008 9:22AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   1 Sep 2008 9:30AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   1 Sep 2008 9:36AM ET

Re: Optional decimal fields with individual operators
Alessio Mazzanti / List   1 Sep 2008 9:46AM ET