|
FAST Protocol
< Previous Next >
Re: FAST Complaints
Joakim Johansson / Tbricks
26 Jan 2010 11:06AM ET I must say it is quite difficult to follow the line of reasoning of this rant which is ripe with personal insults rather than constructive criticism.
One random comment is that although in general, serialization can be a limiting factor, it is clearly not the case here, as data partitioning can be - and is - used where relevant by exchanges (such as the CME and DB), thus parallelizing the FAST streams on a more appropriate level.
It is possible that there are some valid points in here (and I'm sure any good suggestions for improvement would be seriously considered), but without a civil tone and a structured approach to suggesting improvements, they are headed for the eternal bit-bucket.
Joakim
> Some bold statements there (and in typical "enlightened by FAST or FIX"
> fashion, completely missing out on what should be the primary concern).
>
[cut]
>
>
> You're Welcome, Le Sake Of Mankind
Re: FAST Complaints
Joakim Johansson / Tbricks 26 Jan 2010 11:06AM ET
|
